The effect of aggressive fantasizing on aggressive inclinations: Moderating effects of dispositional anger expression.

Experiencing victimization or mistreatment often induces feelings of anger. The catharsis hypothesis suggests that venting anger may aid in alleviating these negative emotions. Although this hypothesis has faced criticism, therapeutic interventions rooted in catharsis are employed to assist victims in managing their anger. One notable application of the catharsis principle in psychotherapeutic practice with victims involves engaging in aggressive fantasies: Victims who harbor aggressive fantasies against their offenders are supported in working with these fantasies to navigate the complex emotions arising from their victimization. Research investigating the effects of aggressive fantasizing on victims has yielded inconsistent findings, with some studies indicating positive and others suggesting negative outcomes. Herein, we examine whether (instructed) aggressive fantasizing diminishes (catharsis hypothesis) or heightens (escalation hypothesis) subsequent aggressive inclinations compared to non-aggressive fantasizing. Additionally, the moderating role of victims' dispositional tendencies to express anger, specifically Anger Expression-out and Anger Expression-control, in the relationship between aggressive fantasizing and aggressive inclinations was examined. We recruited individuals (N = 245) who had experienced victimization through highly unfair treatment and instructed them to imagine confronting their wrongdoer using either aggressive or non-aggressive communication. Participants then reported their aggressive inclinations. Data supported the escalation hypothesis, revealing that aggressive fantasizing amplifies subsequent aggressive inclinations. Importantly, individuals with higher Anger Expression-out demonstrated greater susceptibility to this effect; whereas, Anger Expression-control did not moderate the link between aggressive fantasizing and inclinations. These findings further challenge the catharsis hypothesis and underscore the role of dispositional anger expression tendencies on the effects of aggressive fantasizing.

Understanding mechanisms of depression prevention: study protocol of a randomized cross-over trial to investigate mechanisms of mindfulness and positive fantasizing as intervention techniques for reducing perseverative cognition in remitted depressed individuals.

BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, and involves high relapse rates in which persistent negative thinking and rumination (i.e., perseverative cognition [PC]) play an important role. Positive fantasizing and mindfulness are common evidence-based psychological interventions that have been shown to effectively reduce PC and subsequent depressive relapse. How the interventions cause changes in PC over time, is unknown, but likely differ between the two. Whereas fantasizing may change the valence of thought content, mindfulness may operate through disengaging from automatic thought patterns. Comparing mechanisms of both interventions in a clinical sample and a non-clinical sample can give insight into the effectivity of interventions for different individuals. The current study aims to 1) test whether momentary psychological and psychophysiological indices of PC are differentially affected by positive fantasizing versus mindfulness-based interventions, 2) test whether the mechanisms of change by which fantasizing and mindfulness affect PC differ between remitted MDD versus never-depressed (ND) individuals, and 3) explore potential moderators of the main effects of the two interventions (i.e., what works for whom). METHODS: In this cross-over trial of fantasizing versus mindfulness interventions, we will include 50 remitted MDD and 50 ND individuals. Before the start of the measurements, participants complete several individual characteristics. Daily-life diary measures of thoughts and feelings (using an experience sampling method), behavioural measures of spontaneous thoughts (using the Sustained Attention to Response Task), actigraphy, physiological measures (impedance cardiography, electrocardiography, and electroencephalogram), and measures of depressive mood (self-report questionnaires) are performed during the week before (pre-) the interventions and the week during (peri-) the interventions. After a wash-out of at least one month, pre- and peri-intervention measures for the second intervention are repeated. DISCUSSION: This is the first study integrating self-reports, behavioural-, and physiological measures capturing dynamics at multiple time scales to examine the differential mechanisms of change in PC by psychological interventions in individuals remitted from multiple MDD episodes and ND individuals. Unravelling how therapeutic techniques affect PC in remitted individuals might generate insights that allows development of personalised targeted relapse prevention interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06145984, November 16, 2023.

Alexithymia and automatic processing of facial emotions: behavioral and neural findings.

BACKGROUND: Alexithymia is a personality trait characterized by difficulties identifying and describing feelings, an externally oriented style of thinking, and a reduced inclination to imagination. Previous research has shown deficits in the recognition of emotional facial expressions in alexithymia and reductions of brain responsivity to emotional stimuli. Using an affective priming paradigm, we investigated automatic perception of facial emotions as a function of alexithymia at the behavioral and neural level. In addition to self-report scales, we applied an interview to assess alexithymic tendencies. RESULTS: During 3 T fMRI scanning, 49 healthy individuals judged valence of neutral faces preceded by briefly shown happy, angry, fearful, and neutral facial expressions. Alexithymia was assessed using the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire (BVAQ) and the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia (TSIA). As expected, only negative correlations were found between alexithymic features and affective priming. The global level of self-reported alexithymia (as assessed by the TAS-20 and the BVAQ) was found to be related to less affective priming owing to angry faces. At the facet level, difficulties identifying feelings, difficulties analyzing feelings, and impoverished fantasy (as measured by the BVAQ) were correlated with reduced affective priming due to angry faces. Difficulties identifying feelings (BVAQ) correlated also with reduced affective priming due to fearful faces and reduced imagination (TSIA) was related to decreased affective priming due to happy faces. There was only one significant correlation between alexithymia dimensions and automatic brain response to masked facial emotions: TAS-20 alexithymia correlated with heightened brain response to masked happy faces in superior and medial frontal areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our behavioral results provide evidence that alexithymic features are related in particular to less sensitivity for covert facial expressions of anger. The perceptual alterations could reflect impaired automatic recognition or integration of social anger signals into judgemental processes and might contribute to the problems in interpersonal relationships associated with alexithymia. Our findings suggest that self-report measures of alexithymia may have an advantage over interview-based tests as research tools in the field of emotion perception at least in samples of healthy individuals characterized by rather low levels of alexithymia.

What is alexithymia? Using factor analysis to establish its latent structure and relationship with fantasizing and emotional reactivity.

OBJECTIVE: There is ongoing uncertainty about the structure and definition of alexithymia. Conceptually, alexithymia has traditionally been defined as a multidimensional trait with four components: difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, externally orientated thinking, and difficulty fantasizing. However, some authors suggest that difficulty fantasizing might not be a component, and others suggest low emotional reactivity is a fifth component. In this study, we sought to clarify this issue using factor analysis. METHOD: In a sample of adults (N = 508), we administered a comprehensive battery of psychometric measures and analyzed their latent structure using exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: Subscales assessing difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally orientated thinking all loaded well together on the alexithymia factor. However, none of the subscales assessing aspects of difficulty fantasizing (i.e., daydreaming frequency, vividness, content, or use of daydreams to regulate emotions) loaded on the alexithymia factor. Similarly, no emotional reactivity subscales loaded on the alexithymia factor, and alexithymia was associated with higher (not lower) levels of emotional reactivity for negative emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty fantasizing and low emotional reactivity are not components of the latent alexithymia construct. The traditional four-component definition of alexithymia likely warrants refinement to a more parsimonious three-component solution.

Parallel lives: A phenomenological study of the lived experience of maladaptive daydreaming.

This qualitative study describes the lived experience of maladaptive daydreaming (MD), an excessive form of unwanted daydreaming that produces a rewarding experience based on a created fantasy of a parallel reality associated with a profound sense of presence. A total of 21 in-depth interviews with persons who self-identified as struggling with MD were analyzed utilizing a phenomenological approach. Interviewees described how their natural capacity for vivid daydreaming had developed into a time-consuming habit that resulted in serious dysfunction. The phenomenology of MD was typified by complex fantasized mental scenarios that were often laced with emotionally compensatory themes involving competency, social recognition, and support. MD could be activated if several requirements were met. Because social interaction seems to be incompatible with this absorbing mental activity, solitude was necessary. In addition, kinesthetic activity and/or exposure to evocative music also appeared to be essential features. Besides delivering a firsthand description of key characteristics of MD, the study also indicates that MD is associated with dysfunctionality for which participants expressed a substantial need for help.

Personality and cognitive profiles of a general synesthetic trait.

The recent sharp increase in studies on synesthesia has taught us a lot about this fascinating condition. Still, while we define synesthesia as 'the mixing of senses', the great majority of synesthesia studies focus on only one synesthesia type (in particular grapheme-color synesthesia). In this study, a large group of subjects are tested on the presence or absence of different types of synesthesia. Efforts to recruit a representative sample of the Dutch population, not related to or aware of synesthesia as a research topic, helped counter a selection bias or a self-report bias in our subject group. A sharp increase in synesthesia prevalence was found, at least partially due to including many different types of synesthesia in the synesthesia 'diagnoses'. The five synesthesia types reported in the Novich et al (2011) study were obtained; Colored Sequences, Colored Music, Colored Sensations, Spatial Sequences, Non-Visual Sequelae, as well as an additional synesthesia type, Sequence-Personality. No differences were found between synesthetes and non-synesthetes in education level, handedness, age, and sex. The synesthetes showed increased intelligence as compared with matched non-synesthetes. This was a general effect rather than bound to a specific cognitive domain or to a specific (synesthesia-type to stimulus-material) relationship. The expected effect of increased "Openness" in synesthetes was obtained, as well as two unexpected effects in personality traits (increased "Neuroticism" and decreased "Conscientiousness"). We also found increased "Emotionality" (experiencing emotions) and increased "Fantasizing", but synesthetes did not differ in cognitive appraisal of emotions (identifying/analyzing/verbalizing of emotions). The personality and cognitive characteristics were found related to having synesthesia (in general) rather then to particular synesthesia subtypes. This supports the existence of a general synesthetic 'trait', over the notion of relatively independent 'types' of synesthesia. In further support, exploratory analyses showed that a measurement of synesthetic strength (number of subtypes of synesthesia) correlates with stronger findings (increased "Openness", "Fantasizing", and "Emotionality", and decreased "Conscientiousness"). In conclusion, results are in line with the notion of a general synesthetic 'trait', and this synesthetic trait is associated with particular personality traits and cognitive characteristics.

O fantasiar metapsicológico do psicanalista e aquele do escritor criativo: semelhanças e distinções / The fantasizing in the psychoanalyst's metapsychological work and in the creative writer: similarities and differences / El fantasear metapsicológico del psicoanalista y aquel del escritor creativo: semejanzas y distinciones

Abordamos aqui o que Freud chamou de fantasiar em relação à metapsicologia (seu trabalho epistemológico por excelência) e à atividade do escritor criativo que entendemos como literária. Procuramos mostrar algumas de suas semelhanças e distinções que, por sua vez, remetem ao desejo. A primeira implica uma especulação aliada às objetividades e racionalidade científicas; difere também do irracionalismo de uma autonomização da fantasia. A realização do desejo é aqui indireta. A segunda atividade é considerada como produção imaginativa, criativa e autobiográfica. A realização do desejo é direta aqui.(AU)

We dicuss here, what Freud called "The Metapsychology Fantasize" considering both the metapsychology (his epistemological work par excellence) and the writer’s literary creativity. Some similarities and differences between the two are shown. Both refer to desire. The first one includes speculation associated to both scientific objectivity and rationality. It also differs from an irrationalism drawn on the empowerment of fantasy. Wish fulfillment is not direct here. The second is considered as imaginary, creative and autobiographical. There is a direct wish fulfillment here.(AU)

Tratamos aquí lo que Freud llamó el fantasear en relación a la metapsicología - su trabajo epistemológico por excelencia -, y a la actividad del escritor creativo, comprendida como literaria. Procuramos exponer algunas semejanzas y distinciones entre las dos que, a su vez, se refieren al deseo. La primera implica una especulación aliada a la objetividad y la racionalidad científicas y se distingue del irracionalismo de una autonomización de la fantasía. La realización del deseo aqui es indirecta. La segunda actividad es considerada como producción imaginativa, creativa y autobiográfica. La realización del deseo es directa aquí.(AU)

O fantasiar metapsicológico do psicanalista e aquele do escritor criativo: semelhanças e distinções / The fantasizing in the psychoanalyst's metapsychological work and in the creative writer: similarities and differences / El fantasear metapsicológico del psicoanalista y aquel del escritor creativo: semejanzas y distinciones

Abordamos aqui o que Freud chamou de fantasiar em relação à metapsicologia (seu trabalho epistemológico por excelência) e à atividade do escritor criativo que entendemos como literária. Procuramos mostrar algumas de suas semelhanças e distinções que, por sua vez, remetem ao desejo. A primeira implica uma especulação aliada às objetividades e racionalidade científicas; difere também do irracionalismo de uma autonomização da fantasia. A realização do desejo é aqui indireta. A segunda atividade é considerada como produção imaginativa, criativa e autobiográfica. A realização do desejo é direta aqui.

We dicuss here, what Freud called "The Metapsychology Fantasize" considering both the metapsychology (his epistemological work par excellence) and the writer’s literary creativity. Some similarities and differences between the two are shown. Both refer to desire. The first one includes speculation associated to both scientific objectivity and rationality. It also differs from an irrationalism drawn on the empowerment of fantasy. Wish fulfillment is not direct here. The second is considered as imaginary, creative and autobiographical. There is a direct wish fulfillment here.

Tratamos aquí lo que Freud llamó el fantasear en relación a la metapsicología - su trabajo epistemológico por excelencia -, y a la actividad del escritor creativo, comprendida como literaria. Procuramos exponer algunas semejanzas y distinciones entre las dos que, a su vez, se refieren al deseo. La primera implica una especulación aliada a la objetividad y la racionalidad científicas y se distingue del irracionalismo de una autonomización de la fantasía. La realización del deseo aqui es indirecta. La segunda actividad es considerada como producción imaginativa, creativa y autobiográfica. La realización del deseo es directa aquí.